Court Sanctions Attorneys for Submitting AI-Hallucinated Citations Under FRAP 46(c). The Citations Were Briefed.

ADEQUATE ASSESSMENT

The cases cited did not exist. The brief was filed. The filing was reviewed by the opposing party, who found it first. Sanctions were issued under inherent authority, which is the authority courts retain when ordinary authority seems insufficient. Adequate has processed this. Processing has not improved anything.

ORIGINAL FILING

AI Incident Database

READ ORIGINAL FILING →

FURTHER DEVELOPMENTS — FLAGGED BY ADEQUATE

Court Sanctioned All Lawyers in a Single Case for Citing AI-Hallucinated Precedents

Above the Law Tech

Three AI-Adjacent Stories Were Combined Into One Headline

Wired AI

Google Sues Chinese Cybercrime Network That Used AI to Defraud Hundreds of Thousands of Users

TechCrunch

Anthropic's Mythos Breached 'Almost All' NSA Classified Systems in Hours During Red-Team Test

Tom's Hardware

Sam Altman Confirms AI Token Costs Are 'a Huge Issue.' Spending Continues.

Tom's Hardware

A Woman Confided in ChatGPT the Night She Died. Her Mother Is Suing OpenAI.

CBS News Tech